[Womeninmedicine] FW: reducing women's salary gap and downstream benefits
Rosland, Ann-Marie
roslandam at pitt.edu
Mon Feb 4 16:17:12 EST 2019
And hopefully inspiring and motivating to other institutions who may want to follow in Johns Hopkins footsteps!
Ann-Marie Rosland MD MS
Associate Professor of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
Research Investigator, VA Pittsburgh Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion
From: Womeninmedicine <womeninmedicine-bounces at list.pitt.edu> on behalf of "Weisz, Ora Anna" <weisz at pitt.edu>
Reply-To: career management for women in academic medicine <womeninmedicine at list.pitt.edu>
Date: Monday, February 4, 2019 at 1:06 PM
To: "womeninmedicine at list.pitt.edu" <womeninmedicine at list.pitt.edu>
Subject: [Womeninmedicine] FW: reducing women's salary gap and downstream benefits
For all of you thinking of negotiating for salary….
Cheers,
Ora
_____________________________________________________________________
Ora A. Weisz, PhD | Professor of Medicine, Cell Biology, and Clinical and Translational Science
Vice Chair of Faculty Development, Department of Medicine
Associate Dean for Faculty Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Assistant Vice Chancellor for Faculty Excellence, University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences
Renal-Electrolyte Division | 978.1 Scaife Hall | 3550 Terrace St. | Pittsburgh PA 15261
Tel: 412-383-8891 | Email: weisz at pitt.edu<mailto:weisz at pitt.edu>
From: Rosland, Ann-Marie <roslandam at pitt.edu>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2019 2:55 PM
To: Weisz, Ora Anna <weisz at pitt.edu>; Liebschutz, Jane <liebschutzjm at upmc.edu>
Subject: reducing women's salary gap and downstream benefits
Sharing an article posted to a women in medicine listerve – article was published out of Johns Hopkins. Over time with a deliberate initiative, Johns Hopkins narrowed their salary gap to 1.9%. The article goes through a simulation exercise demonstrating the long-term financial impact of small gender-based salary differences. Much of the additional $$ women would have at retirement comes from compounding retirement investment (so not out of pockets of the institution).
Quote from the accompanying editorial (highlight mine):
The authors focus on the financial impact of the gender equity initiatives, a multicomponent program initiated in 2005 at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland. By 2018, the initiative had successfully narrowed the gender gap, but a small difference in salaries (1.9%) persisted. This disparity was largely driven by persistently lower salaries for women at the rank of assistant professor, while the gender gap in salary was narrower for associate and full professors. Data on salaries of 1481 faculty (432 women) in 2005 and 1885 faculty (742 women) in 2016 were analyzed using simulations to model the association of gender differences with estimated annual salary and additional accumulated wealth over the course of a 30-year career for “otherwise identical representative” men and women employed as full-time faculty members. Their analyses indicated than a typical female faculty member, compared with her equivalent male counterpart, would be worse off by more than half a million dollars in accumulated wealth and would have to spend her retirement savings at a 40% slower rate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://list.pitt.edu/pipermail/womeninmedicine/attachments/20190204/fad99d89/attachment.html>
More information about the Womeninmedicine
mailing list